AustralieFrV1, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 00D137

The ECLW collaborative study II: Patient Registration Form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability

Identifieur interne : 00D137 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 00D136; suivant : 00D138

The ECLW collaborative study II: Patient Registration Form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability

Auteurs : Antonio Lobo [Espagne] ; Frits J. Huyse [Pays-Bas] ; Thomas Herzog [Allemagne] ; Ulrik F. Malt [Norvège] ; Brent C. Opmeer ; Brent C. Eclw [Pays-Bas, Australie]

Source :

Journal of Psychosomatic Research [ 0022-3999 ] ; 1996.

RBID : ISTEX:7013DB2D3AC72C359D4BFD5589D284DA6E01924E

Descripteurs français

Wicri :
- geographic : Pays-Bas.
- topic : Situation de famille, Psychiatrie.

English descriptors

Abstract

Abstract: This paper describes the development and testing of the Patient Registration Form (PRF), a standardized instrument for the description of patients seen by consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists and psychosomatists in general hospitals, the referral patterns, the C-L interventions and their outcomes. The PRF study is part of a large multi-centre, European investigation on the effectiveness of mental health service delivery, conducted by the European C-L Workgroup for General Hospital Psychiatry and Psychosomatics (ECLW) and performed in the framework of the of the E.C. 4th Medical and Health Research Program. The final version of the PRF consists of 68 items. It was developed by the Program Management Group (PMG) and National Coordinators (NC) after long preparatory studies to assure both face and content validity and pilot testing. Two hundred and twenty consultants, who required 40 hours of training and came from 14 different European countries and 90 different sites, participated in the final reliability study. The PRF was tested in 13 written case histories. A ‘gold standard’ for the correct answers in each item was decided by ‘consensus ratings’ of the PMG and a subsequent 80% agreement by the NCs. A high standard (average kappa (κ) ≥ 0.70; at least 2 3 of the PRF items, κ ≥ 0.70) was required for the rater to be considered as ‘reliable’ (RR). The consultants considered the PRF both ‘feasible’ and ‘acceptable’ and 93.2% of them fulfilled the RR criteria. The calculated rater-‘gold standard’ reliability was satisfactory: only four PRF items were identified with low agreement coefficients and no biases were observed cross-nationally in the ratings. Given the implications of misclassification for evaluating C-L effectiveness and services, these results are important and the achievement unprecedented.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/7013DB2D3AC72C359D4BFD5589D284DA6E01924E/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00007-7

Affiliations:

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001508
to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001508
to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002542
to stream Main, to step Merge: 00E299
to stream Main, to step Curation: 00D137

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>The ECLW collaborative study II: Patient Registration Form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lobo, Antonio" sort="Lobo, Antonio" uniqKey="Lobo A" first="Antonio" last="Lobo">Antonio Lobo</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Huyse, Frits J" sort="Huyse, Frits J" uniqKey="Huyse F" first="Frits J." last="Huyse">Frits J. Huyse</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Herzog, Thomas" sort="Herzog, Thomas" uniqKey="Herzog T" first="Thomas" last="Herzog">Thomas Herzog</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Malt, Ulrik F" sort="Malt, Ulrik F" uniqKey="Malt U" first="Ulrik F." last="Malt">Ulrik F. Malt</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Opmeer, Brent C" sort="Opmeer, Brent C" uniqKey="Opmeer B" first="Brent C." last="Opmeer">Brent C. Opmeer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Eclw, Brent C" sort="Eclw, Brent C" uniqKey="Eclw B" first="Brent C." last="Eclw">Brent C. Eclw</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7013DB2D3AC72C359D4BFD5589D284DA6E01924E</idno>
<date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/0022-3999(94)00007-7</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7013DB2D3AC72C359D4BFD5589D284DA6E01924E/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001508</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001508</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001508</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002542</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002542</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-3999:1996:Lobo A:the:eclw:collaborative</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">00E299</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">00D137</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">00D137</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">The ECLW collaborative study II: Patient Registration Form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lobo, Antonio" sort="Lobo, Antonio" uniqKey="Lobo A" first="Antonio" last="Lobo">Antonio Lobo</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Espagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>University of Zaragoza, University Hospital, Zaragoza</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Zaragoza</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Huyse, Frits J" sort="Huyse, Frits J" uniqKey="Huyse F" first="Frits J." last="Huyse">Frits J. Huyse</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>C-L Service Free University Hospital, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement>
<region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Herzog, Thomas" sort="Herzog, Thomas" uniqKey="Herzog T" first="Thomas" last="Herzog">Thomas Herzog</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Alberts Ludwigs University, Freiburg</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region>
<region type="district" nuts="2">District de Fribourg-en-Brisgau</region>
<settlement type="city">Fribourg-en-Brisgau</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Malt, Ulrik F" sort="Malt, Ulrik F" uniqKey="Malt U" first="Ulrik F." last="Malt">Ulrik F. Malt</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Norvège</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Psychosomatic and Behavioral Medicine, University of Oslo, The National Hospital, Oslo</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Oslo</settlement>
<region nuts="2">Østlandet</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Opmeer, Brent C" sort="Opmeer, Brent C" uniqKey="Opmeer B" first="Brent C." last="Opmeer">Brent C. Opmeer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Eclw, Brent C" sort="Eclw, Brent C" uniqKey="Eclw B" first="Brent C." last="Eclw">Brent C. Eclw</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>ECLW Coordination Center, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><settlement type="city">Amsterdam</settlement>
<region nuts="2" type="province">Hollande-Septentrionale</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Australie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>2 In addition to the authors mentioned, the following persons have been actively involved in the design of the study; as National Coordinators: Myriam van Moffaert Belgium, Pekka Tienari Finland, Paul Sakkas Greece, Graça Cardoso and Raul Guimaraes Lopes Portugal, Marco Rigatelli Italy, Maria Dolores Crespo Spain, and Richard Mayou and Francis Creed United Kingdom; as national consultants: Darius Razavi Belgium, Dorte Loldrup and Per Bech Denmark, Edmond Guillibert and Guy Marx France, Barbara Stein and Michael Wirsching Germany, Giovanni Fava Italy, Michiel W. Hengeveld The Netherlands, Inge Refne Norway, Bogdan Radanov and Roger Zumbrunnen Swiss, Torny Person Sweden, and Geoff Lloyd The United Kingdom. Data management and analyses have been taken care of by Andree JMM Rijssenbeek and Gerrit Koopmans The Netherlands, and Barbara Stein Germany. General Consultants of the study have been James J. Strain, Jeffrey S. Hammer and John S. Lyons United States, David Goldberg United Kingdom</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>David Goldberg United Kingdom</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Journal of Psychosomatic Research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">PSR</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3999</idno>
<imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher>
<date type="published" when="1996">1996</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">40</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="143">143</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="156">156</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3999</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-3999</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agreement coefficients</term>
<term>Behavioral approach</term>
<term>Behavioral disorders</term>
<term>Case histories</term>
<term>Case records</term>
<term>Case vignettes</term>
<term>Clin epidemiol</term>
<term>Coefficient</term>
<term>Collaborative study</term>
<term>Comprehensive textbook</term>
<term>Consensus ratings</term>
<term>Consultation process</term>
<term>Content validity</term>
<term>Correct answers</term>
<term>Different european</term>
<term>Different european countries</term>
<term>Different sections</term>
<term>Different sites</term>
<term>Discharge date</term>
<term>Eclw</term>
<term>Eclw study</term>
<term>Educat psychol measur</term>
<term>Educational level</term>
<term>Employment status</term>
<term>European countries</term>
<term>European workgroup</term>
<term>Extreme deviations</term>
<term>Field study</term>
<term>Final version</term>
<term>First consultation</term>
<term>Further training</term>
<term>General hospital</term>
<term>General hospital psychiatry</term>
<term>Global assessment</term>
<term>Grant number</term>
<term>Health care organization</term>
<term>Health services research</term>
<term>Health treatment status</term>
<term>High agreement</term>
<term>Hosp psychiatry</term>
<term>Huyse</term>
<term>Important differences</term>
<term>Important target</term>
<term>International literature</term>
<term>Intraclass correlation coefficients</term>
<term>Kappa coefficients</term>
<term>Large variety</term>
<term>Lobo</term>
<term>Main study</term>
<term>Marital status</term>
<term>Medical settings</term>
<term>Medication</term>
<term>Mental disorders</term>
<term>Mental health service delivery</term>
<term>Mental health services</term>
<term>Minimum validity standards</term>
<term>Motility status</term>
<term>Multiple departments type</term>
<term>National coordinators</term>
<term>Netherlands</term>
<term>Nominal scales</term>
<term>Nominal variables</term>
<term>Ordinal variables</term>
<term>Overall results</term>
<term>Particular item</term>
<term>Patient registration form</term>
<term>Patient status</term>
<term>Percentage agreement</term>
<term>Physical care</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Program management group</term>
<term>Psychiatric</term>
<term>Psychiatric diagnoses</term>
<term>Psychiatric diagnosis</term>
<term>Psychiatry</term>
<term>Psychological behavioural treatment</term>
<term>Rater</term>
<term>Raters</term>
<term>Referral data</term>
<term>Referral patterns</term>
<term>Registration form</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Reliability coefficients</term>
<term>Reliable raters</term>
<term>Satisfactory coefficients</term>
<term>Service delivery</term>
<term>Somatic diagnosis</term>
<term>Test cases</term>
<term>University hospital</term>
<term>Useful comparison</term>
<term>Vignette</term>
<term>Workgroup</term>
<term>World health organization</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Agreement coefficients</term>
<term>Behavioral approach</term>
<term>Behavioral disorders</term>
<term>Case histories</term>
<term>Case records</term>
<term>Case vignettes</term>
<term>Clin epidemiol</term>
<term>Coefficient</term>
<term>Collaborative study</term>
<term>Comprehensive textbook</term>
<term>Consensus ratings</term>
<term>Consultation process</term>
<term>Content validity</term>
<term>Correct answers</term>
<term>Different european</term>
<term>Different european countries</term>
<term>Different sections</term>
<term>Different sites</term>
<term>Discharge date</term>
<term>Eclw</term>
<term>Eclw study</term>
<term>Educat psychol measur</term>
<term>Educational level</term>
<term>Employment status</term>
<term>European countries</term>
<term>European workgroup</term>
<term>Extreme deviations</term>
<term>Field study</term>
<term>Final version</term>
<term>First consultation</term>
<term>Further training</term>
<term>General hospital</term>
<term>General hospital psychiatry</term>
<term>Global assessment</term>
<term>Grant number</term>
<term>Health care organization</term>
<term>Health services research</term>
<term>Health treatment status</term>
<term>High agreement</term>
<term>Hosp psychiatry</term>
<term>Huyse</term>
<term>Important differences</term>
<term>Important target</term>
<term>International literature</term>
<term>Intraclass correlation coefficients</term>
<term>Kappa coefficients</term>
<term>Large variety</term>
<term>Lobo</term>
<term>Main study</term>
<term>Marital status</term>
<term>Medical settings</term>
<term>Medication</term>
<term>Mental disorders</term>
<term>Mental health service delivery</term>
<term>Mental health services</term>
<term>Minimum validity standards</term>
<term>Motility status</term>
<term>Multiple departments type</term>
<term>National coordinators</term>
<term>Netherlands</term>
<term>Nominal scales</term>
<term>Nominal variables</term>
<term>Ordinal variables</term>
<term>Overall results</term>
<term>Particular item</term>
<term>Patient registration form</term>
<term>Patient status</term>
<term>Percentage agreement</term>
<term>Physical care</term>
<term>Pilot study</term>
<term>Program management group</term>
<term>Psychiatric</term>
<term>Psychiatric diagnoses</term>
<term>Psychiatric diagnosis</term>
<term>Psychiatry</term>
<term>Psychological behavioural treatment</term>
<term>Rater</term>
<term>Raters</term>
<term>Referral data</term>
<term>Referral patterns</term>
<term>Registration form</term>
<term>Reliability</term>
<term>Reliability coefficients</term>
<term>Reliable raters</term>
<term>Satisfactory coefficients</term>
<term>Service delivery</term>
<term>Somatic diagnosis</term>
<term>Test cases</term>
<term>University hospital</term>
<term>Useful comparison</term>
<term>Vignette</term>
<term>Workgroup</term>
<term>World health organization</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Pays-Bas</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Situation de famille</term>
<term>Psychiatrie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Abstract: This paper describes the development and testing of the Patient Registration Form (PRF), a standardized instrument for the description of patients seen by consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrists and psychosomatists in general hospitals, the referral patterns, the C-L interventions and their outcomes. The PRF study is part of a large multi-centre, European investigation on the effectiveness of mental health service delivery, conducted by the European C-L Workgroup for General Hospital Psychiatry and Psychosomatics (ECLW) and performed in the framework of the of the E.C. 4th Medical and Health Research Program. The final version of the PRF consists of 68 items. It was developed by the Program Management Group (PMG) and National Coordinators (NC) after long preparatory studies to assure both face and content validity and pilot testing. Two hundred and twenty consultants, who required 40 hours of training and came from 14 different European countries and 90 different sites, participated in the final reliability study. The PRF was tested in 13 written case histories. A ‘gold standard’ for the correct answers in each item was decided by ‘consensus ratings’ of the PMG and a subsequent 80% agreement by the NCs. A high standard (average kappa (κ) ≥ 0.70; at least 2 3 of the PRF items, κ ≥ 0.70) was required for the rater to be considered as ‘reliable’ (RR). The consultants considered the PRF both ‘feasible’ and ‘acceptable’ and 93.2% of them fulfilled the RR criteria. The calculated rater-‘gold standard’ reliability was satisfactory: only four PRF items were identified with low agreement coefficients and no biases were observed cross-nationally in the ratings. Given the implications of misclassification for evaluating C-L effectiveness and services, these results are important and the achievement unprecedented.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li>
<li>Australie</li>
<li>Espagne</li>
<li>Norvège</li>
<li>Pays-Bas</li>
</country>
<region><li>Bade-Wurtemberg</li>
<li>District de Fribourg-en-Brisgau</li>
<li>Hollande-Septentrionale</li>
<li>Østlandet</li>
</region>
<settlement><li>Amsterdam</li>
<li>Fribourg-en-Brisgau</li>
<li>Oslo</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Opmeer, Brent C" sort="Opmeer, Brent C" uniqKey="Opmeer B" first="Brent C." last="Opmeer">Brent C. Opmeer</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Espagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Lobo, Antonio" sort="Lobo, Antonio" uniqKey="Lobo A" first="Antonio" last="Lobo">Antonio Lobo</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
<country name="Pays-Bas"><region name="Hollande-Septentrionale"><name sortKey="Huyse, Frits J" sort="Huyse, Frits J" uniqKey="Huyse F" first="Frits J." last="Huyse">Frits J. Huyse</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Eclw, Brent C" sort="Eclw, Brent C" uniqKey="Eclw B" first="Brent C." last="Eclw">Brent C. Eclw</name>
</country>
<country name="Allemagne"><region name="Bade-Wurtemberg"><name sortKey="Herzog, Thomas" sort="Herzog, Thomas" uniqKey="Herzog T" first="Thomas" last="Herzog">Thomas Herzog</name>
</region>
</country>
<country name="Norvège"><region name="Østlandet"><name sortKey="Malt, Ulrik F" sort="Malt, Ulrik F" uniqKey="Malt U" first="Ulrik F." last="Malt">Ulrik F. Malt</name>
</region>
</country>
<country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Eclw, Brent C" sort="Eclw, Brent C" uniqKey="Eclw B" first="Brent C." last="Eclw">Brent C. Eclw</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Asie/explor/AustralieFrV1/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 00D137 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 00D137 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Asie
   |area=    AustralieFrV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:7013DB2D3AC72C359D4BFD5589D284DA6E01924E
   |texte=   The ECLW collaborative study II: Patient Registration Form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Dec 5 10:43:12 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 14:07:20 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les relations entre la France et l'Australie

The ECLW collaborative study II: Patient Registration Form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability

The ECLW collaborative study II: Patient Registration Form (PRF) instrument, training and reliability

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri